Lumbar Spine Surgery: Interbody Fusion

Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Read what patients are saying: Norbert Alphonso

Background:

Arthritis and degenerative disk disease resulting in low back pain are the leading causes of loss of work in the United States at this time. Between 60 and 80 percent of the population is affected by significant low-back pain at some time. 

The cause of back pain is a complex phenomenon. Back pain has many possible etiologies, including muscular, degenerative, arthritic and neurogenic causes. When the cause of back pain has been localized to degenerative disk disease or "discogenic" pain, and conservative therapy has failed, fusion of the spine may be the treatment of choice. 

The object of a spine fusion is to stabilize or eliminate the movement across a motion segment or a series of motion segments that have degenerated to the point of causing pain. The concept of spine fusion has evolved over the years. Spine fusions involves the production of a solid bony fusion across a motion segment either with bone graft alone or bone graft along with some type of instrumentation. This technique is call interbody fusion.  

A new option for those patients who may not be candidates for conventional spinal fusion or pedicle screws is the intervertebral cage fusion (See Picture). This procedure can be very beneficial in patients whose back pain has been identified as discogenic in nature and who have no significant slippage of the spinal vertebra.  

This approach uses an intervertebral cage made of either metal (packed with bone) or bone alone.  With this placed the body will fuse the two vertebra into one and thereby stop any movement. The metal cage is a hollow, threaded titanium cylinder with multiple openings in the wall for bone fusion. Typically, the cage is packed with bone graft that will ultimately fuse with the vertebrae above and below. These cages are placed after the degenerated disk is removed. The bone then grows through the openings in the cage to create a solid bony fusion. In recent clinical studies, a successful fusion rate of 90 to 92 percent has been reported. The cage that is made of bone works in a similar fashion. 

The advantage to these cages is that the surgery is much less invasive when compared to traditional lumbar fusion and produces immediate stability with less disruption of normal tissues.  Patients can be mobilized more quickly, and often experience less pain and disability in the post –operative period. And they can often return to their normal activities more quickly. Patients will leave the hospital a day or two after this type of fusion procedure and a brace should be wore for one to three months. 

The use of intervertebral cages for spine fusion is a novel and exciting development in the area of spine surgery. This is indicated in patients who have degenerative disk disease characterized by discogenic back pain at one or two levels in the lumbar spine. Most patients can return to normal activities in one to three months. 

Return to Patient Education


Homepage, Physicians, Specialties, Hospitals, Offices, Insurance, Appointments, E-Mail


Disclaimer:

Every effort has been made by the author (s) to provide accurate, up-to-date information. However, the medical knowledge base is dynamic and errors can occur. By using the information contained herein, the viewer willingly assumes all risks in connection with such use. Neither the author nor UPMC shall be held responsible for errors, omissions in information herein nor liable for any special, consequential, or exemplary damages resulting, in whole or in part, from any viewer(s)' use of or reliance upon, this material.

CLINICAL DISCLAIMER:

Clinical information is provided for educational purposes and not as a medical or professional service. Person(s) who are not medical professionals should have clinical information reviewed and interpreted or applied only by the appropriate health professional(s).

For questions or comments, please contact: bostj@msx.upmc.edu

 

© 2008 Tri-State Neurosurgical Associates - UPMC

Last Updated: January 1, 2008